ScanRiverside.com

zz0468, yes, I already pretty much came to all of those conclusions myself regarding the posted methodology for including outside listeners (for encrypted traffic) in our current world view. What I came up with was more relevant (maybe) prior to 9/11 hence why I stated that in the current climate, p...

I think what egilstrap62 was really getting at was more along the lines of how it might be possible to modify the laws in the future to allow non-affiliated folks to have the capability to use a receiver legally to monitor encrypted traffic with appropriate permission/background checks/NDA's (or wha...

Hmm, could you tell what tone they were using - was it different from the tone used on RVC Tac 4 and maybe matched what Murrieta normally uses on their normal dispatch frequency? Was it a multicast such that you can hear the same broadcast on both the normal dispatch frequency and RVC TAC 4 at the s...

cvrules90 wrote:I wonder if maybe it's a business frequency. I've never heard about it before.

It's in the federal government section of the VHF-Hi band so it wouldn't be a business. However, a contractor for a Federal agency might be able to use a fed frequency if authorized for special occasions.

-Mike

Much appreciated, thanks!

-Mike

Will the new RVC Tac 10 be using CTCSS ("toned") as are the other RVC TAC's?

-Mike

Waaaay back in the early to mid 80's when I was in college in Arizona, a fellow student who was also a scanner nut and had some inside info (I can't remember whether it was as a ride-a-long or what) that the CHP and Arizona equivalent (DPS, I think?) used scanners as workarounds in the same way as j...

I don't know your software - "ScanLite Plus" - do you mean "ScanCat lite"? You should know that ScanCat software ("Lite" or standard) is generally not considered dependable or worth much effort. I haven't used it but that is what I have seen reported quite frequently. T...