Colorado River freq for SBSO
Colorado River freq for SBSO
I went to Parker AZ/Earp CA a couple of weekends ago and tried to monitor SBSO on one of their trunk systems. No bueno. I discovered that 866.6375 is in use, non-trunked for the Colorado River an surrounding areas.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
Use System 5 for the area north of Needles, and System 15 in Needles proper. South of Needles uses the desert conventional channels. D-Law-3 for the Havasu area, and D-Law-4 for the Parker area.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
I thought th at Colorado River was RSO.sp1989 wrote:I went to Parker AZ/Earp CA a couple of weekends ago and tried to monitor SBSO on one of their trunk systems. No bueno. I discovered that 866.6375 is in use, non-trunked for the Colorado River an surrounding areas.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
Only the part that goes by Riverside County. Where it passes San Bernardino County, SBSO has it for the California side. Look at a map that shows the county lines next to the river.cvrules90 wrote:I thought th at Colorado River was RSO.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
Ahh so it's one of those places that extends to another county. I'll take a look at a map nevertheless thanks.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
??!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River
The Colorado river crosses 7 states and flows in two different countries. I'm not going to bother with how many counties it passes through. I'll let you do that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River
The Colorado river crosses 7 states and flows in two different countries. I'm not going to bother with how many counties it passes through. I'll let you do that.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
Obviously in my travels I haven't gone that far...
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
Thanks for the info, zz. I had those 2 systems programmed in, but was not receiving anything where I was at. I had no computer access, so had to use the old fashioned search mode on the scanner.
Re: Colorado River freq for SBSO
If you're close enough to a site, close call would also work I believe.sp1989 wrote:Thanks for the info, zz. I had those 2 systems programmed in, but was not receiving anything where I was at. I had no computer access, so had to use the old fashioned search mode on the scanner.