traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post frequencies and talkgroups for Riverside County. In this area you will find some of the most up-to-date frequency/talkgroup notes and information about newly discovered systems.
markb
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:29 am

traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by markb »

Just heard one side of a conversation on 164.1000. The individual said he had poor cell coverage, but did say something to the effect that he was on cell phone check with Andrews.
I have this as a NEST (Nuclear Emergency Search Team) freq, but that is old info. Comms were in analog and I couldn't get a tone, since the conversation was short. He also mentioned switchbacks. sounds like comm techs heading up to a repeater site.
sp1989
Posts: 1017
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by sp1989 »

Plugged it in after I read this, at 1357 hrs I heard a brief bit of conversation, a male talking to someone, sounded like techs or Ham-speak, it quickly faded out, as if it was in a moving vehicle of some type. Will keep monitoring it. Heard from downtown Riverside w/outdoor antenna.
cvrules90
Posts: 1393
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:08 am

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by cvrules90 »

I wonder if maybe it's a business frequency. I've never heard about it before.
retiredFD07
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:53 am

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by retiredFD07 »

I'm not hearing much, but they're using a PL of 110.9. Occasional and brief comms. Sometimes I hear one person, sometimes two.

<>< Mike
Riverside
Mike_G_D
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:58 pm

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by Mike_G_D »

cvrules90 wrote:I wonder if maybe it's a business frequency. I've never heard about it before.
It's in the federal government section of the VHF-Hi band so it wouldn't be a business. However, a contractor for a Federal agency might be able to use a fed frequency if authorized for special occasions.

-Mike
zz0468
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by zz0468 »

Could it be intermod or an image? Being in Corona puts you near Santiago Peak, and that could make your receiver susceptible to interference of various types. I have seen radios just go bananas in and around Corona due to overload.
egilstrap62
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:23 am

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by egilstrap62 »

THATS FUNNY I LIVE AT THE FOOTHILLS OF BOX SPRINGS ON F.M. RADIO ONLY THING I PICK UP IS 99.9 KOLA TILL I GET OUT OF THE AREA 1/2 MILE OR SO. BIG ED
sp1989
Posts: 1017
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by sp1989 »

zz0468 wrote:Could it be intermod or an image? Being in Corona puts you near Santiago Peak, and that could make your receiver susceptible to interference of various types. I have seen radios just go bananas in and around Corona due to overload.
That could very well be it. When I lived in L.A. and tried to monitor the federal VHF high stuff, it happened all the time.
markb
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:29 am

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by markb »

It was on a dual-band amateur mobile. I don't see a whole lot of intermod (at least anything intelligible)in the VHF fed band with this radio, believe it or not. That's why it struck me as out of the ordinary.....
sp1989
Posts: 1017
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: traffic on 164.1000 - Corona area

Post by sp1989 »

On a sort of related note, I remember listening to SS freqs when some big wig was visiting L.A. back in the early 80's, and a freq that never had traffic was suddenly alive, like it was next door. I was hearing comms from George AFB (I think), I remember hearing that a F-4 lost a drop tank on take off, and started a large fire. The response was quite extensive and dramatic. I always wondered if it was a fake, broadcast to divert attention from something else that was happening.
Post Reply