Page 3 of 3
Re: RCPD Channel 3 encrypted?
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:20 pm
by cvrules90
N6AJB wrote:I think the goal is PSEC CAPABLE radios as mutual aid users, or at the bare minumum 800 mhz conventional capability for interop. It is still unknown if Riverside will subscribe to PSEC or upgrade the existing (aging) system.
I think that non-RSO contracts had the EDACS radios used in conventional mode so they could log in to the RSO network if they ever had to. Like you said we could see the same with this system.
And I never knew how old Riverside's UHF radio system was.
Re: RCPD Channel 3 encrypted?
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 7:00 pm
by CQPSK
I've never heard encrypted P25 traffic on CH3 and ALL the traffic I have heard on CH 7 is encrypted. I have not heard a single analog transmission on CH 7 since they cut over to P25. LA IMPACT uses a channel 12.5 kHz away (460.4625) for some of their stuff in the I.E. so it could be their analog traffic that is being heard on .2500.
Re: RCPD Channel 3 encrypted?
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 7:22 pm
by cvrules90
CQPSK wrote:I've never heard encrypted P25 traffic on CH3 and ALL the traffic I have heard on CH 7 is encrypted. I have not heard a single analog transmission on CH 7 since they cut over to P25. LA IMPACT uses a channel 12.5 kHz away (460.4625) for some of their stuff in the I.E. so it could be their analog traffic that is being heard on .2500.
Must have bled over.
Re: RCPD Channel 3 encrypted?
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:20 am
by CQPSK
Oops… I meant 460.2625
Re: RCPD Channel 3 encrypted?
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:49 am
by cvrules90
CQPSK wrote:Oops… I meant 460.2625
You're only human, and humans are bound to make mistakes. It's part of this thing called life.